paper-qa and Paper-Snap

These are competitors in the PDF-RAG-QA space, as both independently implement end-to-end systems for extracting answers from research papers with citations, though Paper-QA targets higher accuracy through established adoption while Paper-Snap emphasizes modern cloud-native infrastructure and faster inference.

paper-qa
77
Verified
Paper-Snap
28
Experimental
Maintenance 20/25
Adoption 12/25
Maturity 25/25
Community 20/25
Maintenance 10/25
Adoption 4/25
Maturity 1/25
Community 13/25
Stars: 8,264
Forks: 838
Downloads:
Commits (30d): 7
Language: Python
License: Apache-2.0
Stars: 5
Forks: 2
Downloads:
Commits (30d): 0
Language: Python
License:
No risk flags
No License No Package No Dependents

About paper-qa

Future-House/paper-qa

High accuracy RAG for answering questions from scientific documents with citations

Implements agentic RAG with iterative query refinement and LLM-based re-ranking, automatically enriches documents with metadata (citations, journal quality) from Semantic Scholar and Crossref, and supports multiple document formats (PDFs, text, code, Office files) with full-text search via tantivy. Integrates with any LiteLLM-supported model provider and offers local embedding alternatives, enabling deployment without proprietary APIs.

About Paper-Snap

Dr-Venom29/Paper-Snap

A cloud-native RAG system for research paper analysis featuring structured PDF ingestion via LangExtract, high-speed Groq (Llama 3.3) inference, and Supabase vector storage.

Scores updated daily from GitHub, PyPI, and npm data. How scores work